Home / How we review
Review methodology
HOW WE REVIEW CASINOS
We look at the rules, not just the offers. This page explains the dimensions behind editorial comparisons.
Our comparison checklist
| Area | What is assessed | Editorial weighting |
|---|---|---|
| Games | Provider list, live/demo access, game rules, RTP variants | 25% |
| Payments | Methods, withdrawal terms, KYC, limits | 25% |
| Bonuses | Wagering, expiry, contribution, maximum win | 20% |
| Consumer protections | Licensing, complaints, self-exclusion tools | 20% |
| Mobile & support | Small-screen usability and contact channels | 10% |
Weightings describe the proposed framework. Legacy featured scores are inherited from the supplied ranking; these weights have not been retroactively applied as a documented audit.
What counts as evidence?
- A dated, accessible casino promotion page for promotional amounts and conditions.
- The legal entity and licence number found in an independent regulatory register.
- Published gaming rules for each slot or table game discussed.
- Time-stamped screenshots, if provided, labelled with their provenance.
- Actual payment test records only when a transaction has been observed and documented.
Updating or contesting an entry
Readers can email Nora Bennett with a page URL, the disputed claim and a reliable supporting source. We correct errors and update the publication record rather than silently inventing new test results.